they are my customer's customer(who is unforunately not running BGP at this
moment), and they choose to stay with existing network infastructure w/o
physical connection change.
Victor
----- Original Message -----
From: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@cisco.com>
To: SHI NOC List <shinoclist@cyberway.com.sg>
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 11:21 AM
Subject: RE: [nsp] Q: EBGP Multihop
>
> If they are a customer, why do you need multihop? How about using BGP with
> your customer?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SHI NOC List [mailto:shinoclist@cyberway.com.sg]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:49 PM
> > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] Q: EBGP Multihop
> >
> >
> > The scenario is:
> > my network running BGP, one of my big customer using static route with
my
> > network, but they have a number of BGP customers that want to
> > stay with this
> > big customer's network yet to use BGP, the situation becomes
interesting:
> > BGP <-->Static <->BGP
> >
> > I'm not very aware about TTL and/or Keepalive in multihop, can elaborate
a
> > bit on this?
> >
> > thks
> > Victor
> >
> > >
> > > > From: "SHI NOC List" <shinoclist@cyberway.com.sg>
> > > > Subject: [nsp] Q: EBGP Multihop
> > > >
> > > > Hi, all
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to have some light in terms of EBGP multihop kind of =
> > > > configuration.
> > > >
> > > > I know some provider doesn't run EBGP multihop with customer
> > while the =
> > > > technology itself is in the market quite sometime.
> > > >
> > > > So is there any concern or reason that those provider are not
> > willing to
> > =
> > > > run EBGP multihop?
> > > >
> > > > thks for your help
> > > >
> > > > Victor
> > >
> >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:19 EDT