This is not your problem. This is your customer's problem. IF your customer
wants to solve this, then they need to run BGP inside their network, with
you, and with their customers.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: shinoclist [mailto:shinoclist@cyberway.com.sg]
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 12:48 AM
> To: Barry Raveendran Greene
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] Q: EBGP Multihop
>
>
> they are my customer's customer(who is unforunately not running
> BGP at this
> moment), and they choose to stay with existing network infastructure w/o
> physical connection change.
>
> Victor
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Barry Raveendran Greene <bgreene@cisco.com>
> To: SHI NOC List <shinoclist@cyberway.com.sg>
> Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2000 11:21 AM
> Subject: RE: [nsp] Q: EBGP Multihop
>
>
> >
> > If they are a customer, why do you need multihop? How about
> using BGP with
> > your customer?
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: SHI NOC List [mailto:shinoclist@cyberway.com.sg]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 7:49 PM
> > > To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > > Subject: Re: [nsp] Q: EBGP Multihop
> > >
> > >
> > > The scenario is:
> > > my network running BGP, one of my big customer using static route with
> my
> > > network, but they have a number of BGP customers that want to
> > > stay with this
> > > big customer's network yet to use BGP, the situation becomes
> interesting:
> > > BGP <-->Static <->BGP
> > >
> > > I'm not very aware about TTL and/or Keepalive in multihop,
> can elaborate
> a
> > > bit on this?
> > >
> > > thks
> > > Victor
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > From: "SHI NOC List" <shinoclist@cyberway.com.sg>
> > > > > Subject: [nsp] Q: EBGP Multihop
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi, all
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to have some light in terms of EBGP multihop kind of =
> > > > > configuration.
> > > > >
> > > > > I know some provider doesn't run EBGP multihop with customer
> > > while the =
> > > > > technology itself is in the market quite sometime.
> > > > >
> > > > > So is there any concern or reason that those provider are not
> > > willing to
> > > =
> > > > > run EBGP multihop?
> > > > >
> > > > > thks for your help
> > > > >
> > > > > Victor
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:19 EDT