Escalate with the carrier until you can get someone capable of helping
vs. finger pointing. 8-)
You're making a good case for the fiber mux being broken or some kind
of incompatible optioning...
George
> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Fri Oct 20 13:04:39 2000
> Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:01:14 -0400
> Received-Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:59:31 -0400
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 13:06:27 -0400 (EDT)
> From: Mike Gibbs <gibbs@servint.com>
> To: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: Problems with a PA-POS card
> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.4.05L.10010201256390.27279-100000@mecca.servint.com>
> Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/4113
> X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
>
>
> To keep going, not to use all of your times, but TAC couldn't figure it
> out yet, either.
>
>
> Light is -22 to -24 dBm to the mux and to the cards
>
>
> The line2 goes:
>
> Miami1 to Madrid
>
> Miami2 to McLean
>
> McLean and Miami1 get these errors:
>
> Oct 20 16:59:20: %SONET-4-ALARM: POS8/0/0: B3 BER exceeds threshold, TC
> alarm declared
>
> and the other to get a AIS
>
> If I loop hard without the routers in miami, madrid and McLean test fine.
> I plug them in, and boom.
>
> If I sent a loopback internal on any of the miamis they test fine, or if I
> hard loop them with fiber, they test fine.
>
> When I do loop internal on miami, the McLean one still gets the errors.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:19 EDT