Yes, but you need to use an image with a "s" in the type letters, which
seems to indicated "switching stuff" - rsp-isv-mz.121-5.T1.bin.
BTW, BVI's pop into existance when you set up the the bridge, I don't
thin you can create them indpendently of this.
Also, if you're doing something simple, like DSL, the new route-bridge
encapsulation that's "mainstreamed" in 12.1(5)T lets you do it more
directly and skip the BVI mess and need for that "s".
Now, if they'd just get that into 12.0S ASAP or quicker, we could come
back just a tad from the bleeding edge...
George
> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Tue Dec 12 14:15:50 2000
> Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 14:05:31 -0500
> Received-Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 14:02:26 -0500
> From: "Jay Stewart" <cosmo@olywa.net>
> To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2000 11:02:28 -0800
> Organization: OlyWa.Net
> Subject: [nsp] IRB?
> Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/4557
> X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
>
> Does the 75xx support Intergrated Routing and Bridging? I have tried both
> 12.1(2)T and 12.1(5)T, but it doesn't seem to want to accept the "bridge irb"
> or "INT BVI X" commands. Or are there any other images that will support IRB
> on the 75xx?
>
> Jay Stewart
> Internet Network Engineer
> Olympia Networking Services - "The Northwest's Premier ISP"
> A wholly owned subsidiary of Advanced TelCom Group, Inc.
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:23 EDT