I am running 12.1(5)T as of now on a 5300/192 with 8 PRIs. Multilink and
compression are on without killing the CPU with one PRI full of heavy ISDN
users.
chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Morrissey [mailto:jwm@rpa.net]
> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2001 11:51 PM
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] AS5300 IOS
>
>
> % Thomas Blauvelt wrote:
> % > It is listed as a 'caveat' on the Cisco web page and was
> described as a
> % > bug when I contacted the TAC (bug id is CSCdp33819). They
> recommended an
> % > upgrade to 12.1(5)T which I haven't done because of the
> increased memory
> % > requirements involved.
> %
> % Hi thomas,
> %
> % What do you mean by "increased memory reqirements" ?
> %
> % I have a bunch of 5300-240 with 64MB of memory each and I'm
> experiencing
> % what seems to be a memory leak. The routers started eating
> memory when I
> % switched from Radius to TACACS+ and I need a reload every 1-2 days.
> %
> % I'm pretty confident that it is a memory leak, but what is
> the memory
> % requrement for 12.1(5)T on 5300s ?
>
> I haven't noticed any increased memory requirements here on
> our 5300-192s
> with 12.1T vs. 12.0T. Right around the point we started using TACACS,
> 12.0(7)T started leaking quite heavily. An upgrade to
> 12.1(1)T cleared it
> up.
>
> While we're on the topic of the 12.1 T-train, what's the
> current recommended
> release to run in 12.1T on AS5300s?
>
> % Daniele
>
> john
> --
> John Morrissey _o /\ ---- __o
> RPA Internet _-< \_ / \ ---- < \,
> jwm@rpa.net __(_)/_(_)________/ \_______(_) /_(_)__
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:25 EDT