and then, you apply that route-map on the input interface like
int e0
ip policy route-map CALM
??
that's what I had and I got "policy rejected" !!!
mp
----- Message d'origine -----
De : "Basil Dolmatov" <dol@office.east.ru>
À : "Martin Picard" <mpicard@sinc.ca>; "Eric Osborne" <eosborne@cisco.com>
Cc : <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Envoyé : 26 janvier, 2001 11:27
Objet : RE: [nsp] IP Policy
> route-map CALM permit 10
> match ip address 140
> set ip precedence routine
> !
>
> This is _working_ route-map from one of my production routers...
>
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Basil (Vasily) V. Dolmatov CCIE# 5347
> LightCom Corp. http://www.lightcom.ru
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Martin Picard [mailto:mpicard@sinc.ca]
> > Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 6:39 PM
> > To: Eric Osborne
> > Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Re: [nsp] IP Policy
> >
> >
> > Eric,
> > Why would I be getting a
> > "policy rejected" message.
> > As soon as I put in "set next-hop"
> > I get "policy routed".
> > I just want to set the precedence
> > for IPs matching an ACL, then do
> > normal routing.
> >
> > mp
> >
> > ----- Message d'origine -----
> > De : "Eric Osborne" <eosborne@cisco.com>
> > À : "Martin Picard" <mpicard@sinc.ca>
> > Cc : <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> > Envoyé : 26 janvier, 2001 10:06
> > Objet : Re: [nsp] IP Policy
> >
> >
> > > Normal routing will still work; after you finish the PBR stuff, you'll
> > > go do a regular route lookup if you need to.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > eric
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:19:10AM -0500, Martin Picard wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > When using "ip policy" to set to ip-precedence,
> > > > does the route-map have to include a set next-hop
> > > > or can normal routing still be used ?
> > > >
> > > > tx
> > > > martin
> > > >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:26 EDT