route-map CALM permit 10
match ip address 140
set ip precedence routine
!
This is _working_ route-map from one of my production routers...
-----------------------------------------------------
Basil (Vasily) V. Dolmatov CCIE# 5347
LightCom Corp. http://www.lightcom.ru
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Picard [mailto:mpicard@sinc.ca]
> Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 6:39 PM
> To: Eric Osborne
> Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [nsp] IP Policy
>
>
> Eric,
> Why would I be getting a
> "policy rejected" message.
> As soon as I put in "set next-hop"
> I get "policy routed".
> I just want to set the precedence
> for IPs matching an ACL, then do
> normal routing.
>
> mp
>
> ----- Message d'origine -----
> De : "Eric Osborne" <eosborne@cisco.com>
> À : "Martin Picard" <mpicard@sinc.ca>
> Cc : <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Envoyé : 26 janvier, 2001 10:06
> Objet : Re: [nsp] IP Policy
>
>
> > Normal routing will still work; after you finish the PBR stuff, you'll
> > go do a regular route lookup if you need to.
> >
> >
> >
> > eric
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 09:19:10AM -0500, Martin Picard wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > When using "ip policy" to set to ip-precedence,
> > > does the route-map have to include a set next-hop
> > > or can normal routing still be used ?
> > >
> > > tx
> > > martin
> > >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:26 EDT