RE: RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question

From: Frank Bruce (fbruce@cisco.com)
Date: Sun Feb 11 2001 - 16:56:38 EST


Sorry, you've confused me, it is very easilly done.

How does this relate to MPLS VPNs with TE ?

/F

-----Original Message-----
From: rkuhljr@uol.com.br [mailto:rkuhljr@uol.com.br]
Sent: 11 February 2001 21:44
To: Frank Bruce
Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re:RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question

>Look at IS-IS as an IGP, the TE features for MPLS are interesting, the
IS-IS
>IGP has been seen to scale to more routers per level, and the processing
>overhead is less than that of OSPF.

It seems that 12.1(E) IOS for Cat6K have more caveats with IS-IS than with
OSPF...

Rubens Kuhl Jr.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:28 EDT