Many networks include Cat6K at aggregation/distribution level and 7x00/GSRs at borders; choosing a Link State Protocol has not only to do with features, but also to whatever caveats/bugs/ghosts the implementations have on the chosen platforms.
Rubens Kuhl Jr.
>>Sorry, you've confused me, it is very easilly done.
>
>How does this relate to MPLS VPNs with TE ?
>
>/F
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: rkuhljr@uol.com.br [mailto:rkuhljr@uol.com.br]
>Sent: 11 February 2001 21:44
>To: Frank Bruce
>Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re:RE: [nsp] ospf and bgp design question
>
>
>>Look at IS-IS as an IGP, the TE features for MPLS are interesting, the
>IS-IS
>>IGP has been seen to scale to more routers per level, and the processing
>>overhead is less than that of OSPF.
>
>It seems that 12.1(E) IOS for Cat6K have more caveats with IS-IS than with
>OSPF...
>
>
>
>Rubens Kuhl Jr.
>
--- UOL: o melhor da Internet.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:28 EDT