RE: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!
From: ken lindahl (lindahl@ack.Berkeley.EDU)
Date: Thu Mar 01 2001 - 12:14:33 EST
- Next message: Ian Cox: "Re: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Previous message: F. David Sinn: "RE: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Maybe in reply to: Alex Rubenstein: "[nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Next in thread: José Domínguez: "Re: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Reply: José Domínguez: "Re: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Reply: Ian Cox: "RE: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, "F. David Sinn" <dsinn@cisco.com> wrote:
>What you need to do is enable CAR on the Catalyst side of the hybrid
>configuration. I don't have the URL in front of me right now, but will look
>for it and get back to you.
interesting. our cisco support folk seemed to encourage us to run
"non-hybrid" configuration (IOS on MSFC, cat6000-sup* on the sup) last
year when we brought the first of these up. (fwiw, these are
sup1/PFC1/MSFC1 in case that matters.)
is there a way to accomplish CAR-like rate-limiting in this configuration?
(i haven't had a need, but assumed all along that it could be done using
some of the cat6000-sup* QoS features.) or should we be looking at converting
to hybrid configuration?
thanks,
ken
- Next message: Ian Cox: "Re: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Previous message: F. David Sinn: "RE: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Maybe in reply to: Alex Rubenstein: "[nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Next in thread: José Domínguez: "Re: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Reply: José Domínguez: "Re: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Reply: Ian Cox: "RE: [nsp] MSFC, PFC, CEF, CAR, oh boy!"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29
: Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:30 EDT