RE: [nsp] Getting BGP not to aggregate

From: Karyn Ulriksen (kulriksen@publichost.com)
Date: Tue Mar 13 2001 - 12:08:53 EST


Just to do a follow up here... it turned out that I had not set the mask on
my /24s I listed in the bgp network statements. I had @SSumed that "network
xxx.xxx.xxx.0" would see it as a class C by default since I'd seen that
behaviour before. Oh well, live and learn!

Anyways, it's properly aggregating.

Just to fend of any flames by those who didn't read the original message.
I'm slicing this /20 up into /24s to accomodate a data center migration and
then I'll be re-aggregating everything after the move.

Thanks for all your input.

Karyn

:: -----Original Message-----
:: From: Alfredo Sola [mailto:alfredo@intelideas.com]
:: Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 2:57 AM
:: To: Karyn Ulriksen
:: Cc: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net; 'list@inet-access.net'
:: Subject: Re: [nsp] Getting BGP not to aggregate
::
::
::
:: > I'm migrating a data center and need to temporarily split
:: up a /20 into
:: > chunks. Naturally, I normally had the /20 aggregated.
:: Problem is, I need
:: > it NOT to aggregate for the few weeks during the move.
:: Already made
:: > arrangements with the upstreams. However, my problem is
:: that even though I
:: > removed the aggregate statements and soft bumped the bgp,
:: the route is still
:: > aggregating. I'm researching this in other resources
:: (translated, the ole
::
:: Do you have "no auto-summary"?
::
:: --
:: Alfredo Sola
:: Director técnico
::
:: () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail
:: /\ - against ms attachments
::



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT