I don't remember our RSP-8 being noticably shower than a RSP-4.
In a dual processor configuration doing writes takes forever,
presumably because it also has to update the second processor,
probably across the diag-bus or some kind of shared memory thing...
George
> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Tue Mar 13 18:01:03 2001
> Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 18:00:45 -0500
> Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:57:27 -0500
> From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> To: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:54:15 -0500
> Subject: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
> Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/5681
> X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
>
> Folks,
>
> Has anyone seen a significant increase in NVRAM access time over RSP4 when
> writing a config to it? I am seeing a 100 line config take 20-30 seconds to
> save, and with HSA, about 45-60 seconds total.
>
> Any ideas? I know it's a larger NVRAM - maybe this is it?
>
> Running 12.0(11)S3
>
> thx,
> ./chris
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT