I was wrong, no bug here - RSP8 does write nvram slower than RSP4.
Sorry.
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
To: "'Danny Sutantyo'" <dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com>; "Martin,
Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:30 PM
Subject: RE: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
>
> Danny,
>
> It is an RSP8 - which only goes in a 7500... ;)
>
> As far as RSP4 performance, 1000 line configs save in 2-4 secs. RSP8 in
> 20-30, 100 lines.
>
> I cannot find a DDTS on this. Anyone have it?
>
> thx,
> chris
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Danny Sutantyo [mailto:dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:27 PM
> To: Martin, Christian
> Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> Subject: Re: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
>
>
> I think depends on the router you are using, routers like 7500, it's slow
> to write mem...
> DS
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Martin, Christian wrote:
>
> > Folks,
> >
> > Has anyone seen a significant increase in NVRAM access time over RSP4
when
> > writing a config to it? I am seeing a 100 line config take 20-30
seconds
> to
> > save, and with HSA, about 45-60 seconds total.
> >
> > Any ideas? I know it's a larger NVRAM - maybe this is it?
> >
> > Running 12.0(11)S3
> >
> > thx,
> > ./chris
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT