Ok, so my memory is not that bad after all... ;-)
Mike
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Rubenstein" <alex@nac.net>
To: "Mike Axelrod" <maxelrod@digisle.net>
Cc: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>; "'Danny Sutantyo'"
<dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com>; <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
>
>
> There is a bug (one of my techs confirmed it with cisco), something about
> calculating a CRC...
>
> To be fixed in 12.0.15S or some such.
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Mike Axelrod wrote:
>
> > I was wrong, no bug here - RSP8 does write nvram slower than RSP4.
> > Sorry.
> > Mike
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin, Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> > To: "'Danny Sutantyo'" <dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com>; "Martin,
> > Christian" <cmartin@gnilink.net>
> > Cc: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 3:30 PM
> > Subject: RE: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
> >
> >
> > >
> > > Danny,
> > >
> > > It is an RSP8 - which only goes in a 7500... ;)
> > >
> > > As far as RSP4 performance, 1000 line configs save in 2-4 secs. RSP8
in
> > > 20-30, 100 lines.
> > >
> > > I cannot find a DDTS on this. Anyone have it?
> > >
> > > thx,
> > > chris
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Danny Sutantyo [mailto:dsutanty@dsutanty-wkst.sc.intel.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 6:27 PM
> > > To: Martin, Christian
> > > Cc: 'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> > > Subject: Re: [nsp] RSP8 and SLLOOOWWW 'wr mem' performance
> > >
> > >
> > > I think depends on the router you are using, routers like 7500, it's
slow
> > > to write mem...
> > > DS
> > > On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Martin, Christian wrote:
> > >
> > > > Folks,
> > > >
> > > > Has anyone seen a significant increase in NVRAM access time over
RSP4
> > when
> > > > writing a config to it? I am seeing a 100 line config take 20-30
> > seconds
> > > to
> > > > save, and with HSA, about 45-60 seconds total.
> > > >
> > > > Any ideas? I know it's a larger NVRAM - maybe this is it?
> > > >
> > > > Running 12.0(11)S3
> > > >
> > > > thx,
> > > > ./chris
> > > >
> >
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:32 EDT