upgrade to 12.1(7) unless you like known bugs...
alernatives being 12.1(5)T5 or 12.1(6)E if
you're not on the standard train...
beyond that, make sure that you have appropriate
route-caching, including route-cache same-interface
on your fast-e's.
George
> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Mon Apr 9 10:41:41 2001
> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:34:16 -0400
> X-From_: rcrundwell@verisign.com Mon Apr 9 10:34:15 2001
> Received-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:34:15 -0400
> From: "Crundwell, Richard" <rcrundwell@verisign.com>
> To: "'cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net'" <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
> Subject: problems using RSP8 on 7505
> Old-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:27:34 -0400
> Old-X-Envelope-To: cisco-nsp
> Resent-From: jared@puck.nether.net
> Resent-Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:37:00 -0400
> Resent-To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/6024
> X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
>
> Was running 12.1(2)
>
> has anyone experienced any problems running RSP8's on a 7505? We've run
> several of these in 3 different routers all run fine until we put some load
> on them. Problems we've experienced. router begins to reboot. Fast E back to
> internal network takes massive errors and failed (even when moving to
> alternalte fast e's on router.
>
> We've RMA'd 4 rsp8 and replacements begin to do the same thing. Any ideas
> folks?
>
> Richard W. Crundwell
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:34 EDT