Re: [nsp] ISDN BRI:B2 channel

From: Gert Doering (gert@greenie.muc.de)
Date: Wed Apr 25 2001 - 14:49:46 EDT

Next message: Dan Hollis: "[nsp] oam segment loopback from ios?"
Previous message: Chris Davis: "RE: [nsp] Trapped in a loop"
In reply to: Mark Borchers: "RE: [nsp] ISDN BRI:B2 channel"
Next in thread: Stephane Perez: "RE: [nsp] ISDN BRI:B2 channel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 09:22:29AM -0500, Mark Borchers wrote:
> Cisco's ISDN implementation is just ridiculously convoluted.

Hmmm, while I don't like it myself, I don't think this is warranted here.

ISDN in the states is just horribly broken :-)

Here in Europe (or at least: in Euro-ISDN-Land) there is NO reason why
anybody would *want* to dial out "on B2 channel only".

There is no difference at all between B1 and B2 channel. The switch
assigns whatever it likes, and there's no difference.

There are no SPIDs here either. They are just not necessary.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

Next message: Dan Hollis: "[nsp] oam segment loopback from ios?"
Previous message: Chris Davis: "RE: [nsp] Trapped in a loop"
In reply to: Mark Borchers: "RE: [nsp] ISDN BRI:B2 channel"
Next in thread: Stephane Perez: "RE: [nsp] ISDN BRI:B2 channel"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:35 EDT