Re: RE: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+

From: Gert Doering (gert@greenie.muc.de)
Date: Fri Jun 15 2001 - 05:04:21 EDT

Next message: Alessandro Chiolo: "[nsp] Cisco IOS Server Load Balancing"
Previous message: rkuhljr@uol.com.br: "Re:RE: RE: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
In reply to: Martin, Christian: "RE: RE: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Next in thread: Robert E. Seastrom: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:56:53PM -0400, Martin, Christian wrote:
> I have many, many POS interfaces running on 7513s, all just fine. Hrmmm.

POSIPs or PA-POS on VIPs?

We have also good experiences with PA-POSs, so I assume the original
poster referred to the POSIPs.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

Next message: Alessandro Chiolo: "[nsp] Cisco IOS Server Load Balancing"
Previous message: rkuhljr@uol.com.br: "Re:RE: RE: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
In reply to: Martin, Christian: "RE: RE: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Next in thread: Robert E. Seastrom: "Re: [nsp] GEIP vs. GEIP+"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:42 EDT