Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> writes:
> POSIPs or PA-POS on VIPs?
>
> We have also good experiences with PA-POSs, so I assume the original
> poster referred to the POSIPs.
Problems with either would be a new one on me.
Assuming, of course, that you have enough memory/buffer/etc on the vip
(either posip or pa-pos). Cisco _did_ make a vip2-40 POSIP that might
have been a little weak, but I think they were a TTM thing.
---Rob
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:42 EDT