Re: [nsp] ip accounting-transit?

From: George Robbins (grr@shandakor.tharsis.com)
Date: Mon Jun 18 2001 - 17:01:42 EDT


It works, it's an dest/inverse netmask if I recall, where a reference
to an extended access list would be more useful, not to mention
something like "ip accounting *in*".

An overall feature description would be useful, but you can find info
on transits and violations if you search on CCO.

                                                George

> From cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net Mon Jun 18 16:47:51 2001
> Resent-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:47:45 -0400
> Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 16:45:14 -0400
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 22:45:34 +0200
> From: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de>
> To: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> X-mgetty-docs: http://alpha.greenie.net/mgetty/
> Subject: [nsp] ip accounting-transit?
> Resent-From: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> X-Mailing-List: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net> archive/latest/6878
> X-Loop: cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: cisco-nsp-request@puck.nether.net
>
> Hi,
>
> starting from the "ip netflow feature-accelerate"-Thread I went to CCO
> to find out what this does (and couldn't find anything useful - it's
> mentioned in a couple of sample configurations, but never fully
> *explained* - or at least I didn't find the relevant page).
>
> On the way I found another interesting command,
> "ip accounting-transits count"
> described as:
> Control the number of transit records that
> will be stored in the IP accounting
> database"
>
> now what's this? What is considered a "transit record"? It sounds
> similar to "ip accounting-threshold", but I can't see where it fits in?
> Maybe it goes together with "ip accounting-list" (which I don't use
> 'cause it isn't too useful for us)?
>
> Also, I just found that I don't understand "ip accounting-list" either - I
> thought it would restrict the IP addresses that go into accounting, but
> it doesn't work (with 12.2(2)T) - I have set "ip accounting-list" entries
> for two single hosts, and "show ip account" shows everything that passes
> through this router. Does someone have a working sample for *this*?
>
> confused,
>
> gert
>
> --
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
> //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:42 EDT