Re: [nsp] Monitoring BGP routes...

• Next message: Nimesh vakharia: "[nsp] 1483 routed vs bridged."
• Previous message: R.P. Aditya: "Re: [nsp] Monitoring BGP routes..."
• In reply to: Alan Halachmi: "[nsp] Monitoring BGP routes..."
• Next in thread: Nimesh vakharia: "[nsp] 1483 routed vs bridged."
• Reply: Nimesh vakharia: "[nsp] 1483 routed vs bridged."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

IOS has a per-neigbor knob, maximum-prefix <max> <threshold> warning-only.

By default, it shuts down the session. If you don't want that, use the warning-only option and monitor your syslog.

--
walter
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 02:40:35PM -0400, Alan Halachmi wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> 	Can anyone recommend a program that checks to ensure that a BGP
> peer is sending a sane number of BGP routes?  I use rtrmon to check for BGP
> sessions, just my ISP unintentionally change me from a full-route connection
> to a default-route-only and it would have been nice to have gotten
> notification that I only had 1 route against that peer.
> 
> TIA!
> Alan
> 
> --
> Alan Halachmi
> Wide Area Network Specialist
> Ingram Entertainment Network Services
> mailto:alan@halachmi.net
> http://www.ingramentertainment.com
> 
> 

• Next message: Nimesh vakharia: "[nsp] 1483 routed vs bridged."
• Previous message: R.P. Aditya: "Re: [nsp] Monitoring BGP routes..."
• In reply to: Alan Halachmi: "[nsp] Monitoring BGP routes..."
• Next in thread: Nimesh vakharia: "[nsp] 1483 routed vs bridged."
• Reply: Nimesh vakharia: "[nsp] 1483 routed vs bridged."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:43 EDT