You should look into RBE instead of BVIs. just a suggestion. RBE is CEF
switched, BVI is not scalable.
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork@inch.com]
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 3:13 PM
To: Jared Mauch
Cc: Przemyslaw Karwasiecki; Eric L. Howard; Cisco NSP List
Subject: Re: [nsp] 7206 config/IOS recommendation...
Hi,
Will the version Jared suggested below support bridging for BVIs? In the
past it did not, because the bridging component is part of either IP-plus
or Enterprise, I believe.
If anyone is running this (or an earlier release) and doing 1483 DSL
stuff with BVI's, please let me know... I'm also unclear on whether dot1q
is CEF switched or not in this version.
Thanks,
Charles
On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Jared Mauch wrote:
> I suggest c7200-k4p-mz.120-18.S.bin
>
> Or 12.0(17)S1
>
> - jared
>
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2001 at 02:41:15PM -0400, Przemyslaw Karwasiecki wrote:
> > Use feature navigator to verify if 802.1q is available
> > on train you will select.
> >
> > For instance Network Provider train doesn't support 802.1q
> >
> > Przemek
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Eric L. Howard [mailto:elh@outreachnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 1:48 PM
> > To: Cisco NSP List
> > Subject: [nsp] 7206 config/IOS recommendation...
> >
> >
> > I'm in the process of spec'ing a 7206VXR w/ 2xPA-MC-2T3+ and was
wondering
> > what train has shown good success w/ this config. Nothing to crazy
going on
> > here...a few BGP sessions for upstream and all static (currently) on the
> > inside. Although 802.1q will be coming up shortly.
> >
> > ~ELH~
> >
> > --
> > Eric L. Howard e l h @ o u t r e a c h n e t w o r k s . c o m
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > www.OutreachNetworks.com 313.297.9900
>
> --
> Jared Mauch | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
> clue++; | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/ My statements are only
mine.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:47 EDT