Re: [nsp] cisco 2511 config

From: Charles Sprickman (spork@inch.com)
Date: Sat Jul 28 2001 - 00:23:27 EDT

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001 gza@raiden.modarex.ro wrote:

> router#copy tftp startup-config
> it says
> Non-Volatile Memory in use[Failed]

Sounds like you've got another session up on the router doing a "sh conf"
or "wr t". Do a "who" and see if there's a session you've forgotten
about...

Charles

> TX
> ---------------------
> GZA reads all e-mails
> ---------------------
>
>

From jakasemboeng@ekõÅ;.c
Received: from someone claiming to be
        jktsm01.indosat.net.id (jktsm01.indosat.net.id [202.1õÅ;0.
        by
        for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 12:35õÅ;-0
        (eNvelope-from jakasemboeng@ekilat.com)
Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 12:35:07 -0400
Received: from dds ([202.155.4õÅ;9]
          (InterMail vK.4.02.00.10 201-232-116-110 license 730f8eb5c6a4977202bec32590427e0f)
 õÅ;
          for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:39:24 õÅ;0
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 23:36:13 +0700
MessaõÅ;D:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
        charset="us-ascii"
CoõÅ;t-
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (ðëÅ;29
IMportan
X-MimeOLE: Produced By MicðëÅ;ft

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Patriawan CõÅ;s
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2001 12:10 PM
> Subject: Cisco GSR 12416 vs Juniper M160
>
>
> CõÅ; k
>
> http://www.mier.com/reports/cisco/Cisco12400JuniperM160.pdf
>
> http://www.mier.com
>
>Any comõÅ; a

From jlewis@lewis.orõÅ;at
Received: from someone claiming to be
        redhat1.mmaero.com (IDENT:root@[208.152.224.2])
        by puck.netõÅ;ne
        for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 13:13:20 -0400
        (envelope-fõÅ;jl
Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 13:13:20 -0400
Received: from localhost (jlewis@localhost)
        by redhat1.mmaõÅ;co
        for <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Sat, 28 Jul 2001 13:13:19 -0400
X-Authentication-õÅ;in
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 13:13:19 -0400 (EDT)
From: <jlewis@lewis.org>õÅ;en
To: <cisco-nsp@puck.nether.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107281253230.1854-100000@redõÅ;.m
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: [nsp] MPLS VPN questions

I've put togethõÅ; s
routers (1 7206, 1 3640), and 3 CE routers. The layout is:

     CE1õÅ;
CE2- PE1---PE2---CE3

The example I'm sort of following is
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/mpls_vpn_basic.html
thoõÅ;th
confusing.

At first, I setup just PE1, CE1, and CE2 as õÅ; g
NM-1E2W in PE1. That worked without any trouble. PE1 has static vrf
routes for private /24's to õÅ; C
other. PE1 can ping vrf the CE1 and CE2.

Then I added PE2 (ethernet crossover froõÅ;PA
NM-1E2W on the 3640). I setup another 3640 as CE3 with a T3 into a PA-T3
on the 7200. CE3 is confiõÅ;d
and PE2 can ping vrf CE3.

Then I setup BGP on PE1 and PE2, and verified that tõÅ;rf
being propogated. The trouble is, I can't ping from CE1 or CE2 to CE3,
and I can't ping vrf from PE1 to CE3.
õÅ;id
who apparently followed the same example and setup tõÅ;am
and ran into the same problem. I didn't find any followups to his post
and his address bounces, so I wasn'õÅ;le
problem.

I can post actual configs a little later. I don't have access to them
right now. TheõÅ;36
is running c7200-p-mz.121-5.T8.bin. 

-- 
-----------------------------õÅ;-- Jon Lewis *jlewis@lewis.org*|  I route
 System Administrator        |  therefore you õÅ; A_________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:47 EDT