Hi,
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 03:08:16PM +0200, Gert Doering wrote:
> does one of you have "in-depth experience" with bouter-based netflow
> aggregation, to be specific, prefix aggregation?
>
> I did some testing with it today, using the packet documentation in
> http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/rtrmgmt/nfc/\
> nfc_3_0/nfc_ug/nfcform.htm
> (wrapped by hand), and it seems that the "src_mask" and "dst_mask"
> fields for the "RouterPrefix Flow Record Format" are sent in the
> wrong order.
As a followup on this - I checked with some Cisco people that verified
that the documentation above is wrong. In the "prefix aggregation" and
"prefix-tos aggregation" records, src_mask and dst_mask are just used the
other way round.
This won't be changed (never change a data structure that is being used
by applications! - I agree on this), so it's a documentation bug.
I have been told it's bug number CSCdv60220, but it's not end-user
visible, so I can't check this.
gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:51 EDT