[nsp] Cisco access-list - multihomed question

• Next message: Yuval Ben-Ari: "RE: [nsp] frac t3 down when access-list changed"
• Previous message: Joe Hsieh: "RE: [nsp] Cisco GSR12012 support 3port GE line card ?"
• Next in thread: Chief Technology Officer-ISPKenya: "[nsp] Cisco access-list - multihomed question"
• Maybe reply: Chief Technology Officer-ISPKenya: "[nsp] Cisco access-list - multihomed question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

The scenario.

- Two upstream circuits on the same border router
- I want to use one to carry (outgoing) traffic for certain customer networks only
- I want to use the other as the standard default for all other customer traffic

   Upst #1 s0/0 [---------]
--------------------[ ]< Upst #1 should route traffic for x.y.z.0/25
                    [ ]
--------------------[ ]
   Upst #2 s1/0:16 [---------]< Upst #2 should route traffic for all others

- Both upstream connections go to the same provider
- There is no BGP with upstream provider, only static defaults (until now)

Instinctively I want to define route-maps to block traffic for #2 from #1 and block traffic for #1 from #2 with a "next-hop" statement to redirect in each route-map.

Is this the right logic? Anyone with similar experience who can give tips?

Thanks,

Brian Longwe

• Next message: Yuval Ben-Ari: "RE: [nsp] frac t3 down when access-list changed"
• Previous message: Joe Hsieh: "RE: [nsp] Cisco GSR12012 support 3port GE line card ?"
• Next in thread: Chief Technology Officer-ISPKenya: "[nsp] Cisco access-list - multihomed question"
• Maybe reply: Chief Technology Officer-ISPKenya: "[nsp] Cisco access-list - multihomed question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:52 EDT