Re: Service Provider and the 7600?

From: Gert Doering (gert@greenie.muc.de)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2001 - 13:02:21 EST

Next message: KF: "RE: [nsp] 2924M XL DC"
Previous message: Jared Mauch: "Re: [nsp] how to use MBGP table for RPF?"
In reply to: Goodwin, Dustin T [IT]: "Service Provider and the 7600?"
Next in thread: Simon Leinen: "Re: Service Provider and the 7600?"
Reply: Simon Leinen: "Re: Service Provider and the 7600?"
Reply: Simon Leinen: "Re: Service Provider and the 7600?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hi,

On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 11:52:05AM -0500, Goodwin, Dustin T [IT] wrote:
> For service providers that want a box for below OC-192 applications is the
> 7600 make inroads on the GSR? It seems to exceed the GSR in some respects.

It certainly looks nice. I didn't hear any positive or negative
real-world comments about it yet, unfortunately...

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

Next message: KF: "RE: [nsp] 2924M XL DC"
Previous message: Jared Mauch: "Re: [nsp] how to use MBGP table for RPF?"
In reply to: Goodwin, Dustin T [IT]: "Service Provider and the 7600?"
Next in thread: Simon Leinen: "Re: Service Provider and the 7600?"
Reply: Simon Leinen: "Re: Service Provider and the 7600?"
Reply: Simon Leinen: "Re: Service Provider and the 7600?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:12:57 EDT