Re: [nsp] Two OSPF precess for the same VRF

From: Zaheer Aziz (zaziz@cisco.com)
Date: Tue Jan 22 2002 - 12:47:30 EST


At 03:11 PM 1/21/2002 -0500, Manpreet Singh wrote:

how about doing this

>router ospf 10 vrf test
> redistribute bgp metric 20
> network 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 area 0
> network 172.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 area 0

Zaheer

>Hi,
> If there are two OSPF processes configured for the same VRF name, is
>
>it necessary to put a "redistribute ospf" statement in each other's
>instance ?
>
>eg. 2 CEs belonging to the same VPN connected to on PE.
>
>ip vrf test
> rd 100:10
> route-target....
>
>
>interface ethernet 0/1
> ip vrf forwarding test
> ip address 10.10.0.1 255.255.255.252
>
> interface ethernet 0/2
> ip vrf forwarding test
> ip address 172.10.0.1 255.255.255.252
>
>router ospf 10 vrf test
> redistribute bgp metric 20
> network 10.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 area 0
>
>router ospf 100 vrf test
> redistribute bgp metric 20
> network 172.10.0.0 255.255.0.0 area 0
>
>Because these two OSPF process are populating the routing instance
>"test", do i still need to redistribute ospf in to each other.
>
>
>-thanks in advance
>
> Manpreet



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:00 EDT