actually we have been added static route for 10.10.24.10
and the other router is juniper
At 02:01 PM 1/30/2002 +0100, Ben Buxton wrote:
>The router is receiving a next-hop of 10.10.24.10 via bgp,
>however it does not have a valid IGP route to this IP
>address. Make sure 10.10.24.10 is in your routing
>table. However that is probably not what the real problem
>is...it looks like the peer 22.214.171.124 is giving this
>address as next-hop, when it probably wants to advertise
>a non-rfc1918 address.
>Be careful if you see rfc1918 together with BGP...
>From: Raymond Leung [mailto:email@example.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 1:21 PM
>Subject: [nsp] [nsp]Wanna ask about BGP on cisco
>why will like that ?
>tip#sh ip bgp 126.96.36.199/20
>BGP routing table entry for 188.8.131.52/20, version 103430615
>Paths: (1 available, no best path)
> Not advertised to any peer
> 10032 3549 7170 1455, (received & used)
> 10.10.24.10 (inaccessible) from 10.10.24.10 (184.108.40.206)
> Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, internal
>please advice why will inaccessible , thx thx !!!!!
>Zonasa Network Limited
>Suite 903,Technology Plaza
>651 King's Road
>AS4841 Object Maintainer
Zonasa Network Limited
Suite 903,Technology Plaza
651 King's Road
AS4841 Object Maintainer
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:02 EDT