Hello,
Hello, this is a resend. I have mentioned before that
my provider will provide a VLAN for me. That is not
the case. It will be a routed network with each
endpoint connecting via ethernet. Each point will
receive an ip address not necessarily on the same
subnet. My worry here is I only have one ethernet port
on my 2501s and I need to connect my servers to my
LAN. This kind of connection is cheaper compared to a
point-to-point leased circuit thats is why we are
getting it.
Please help. Thanks.
I have the ff setup: 2 cisco 2501s and two unmanaged
switches connected over a provider's ethernet VPN
network.
switchA ----------------------- switchB
| provider ethernet |
| network |
lan A
lan
B
Connected to switch A are 2501A and serverA. Connected
to switchB are 2501B and serverB.
ServerA and 2501A are part of LAN A ip address, say
10.1.1.0/255.
ServerB and 2501B are part of LAN B, say 10.1.2.0/255.
. I will configure GRE tunnel between 2 2501s so that
LAN B and LAN A can see each other. will just put
static routes to the tunnel interface for
these.Secondary ip addresses on the 2501s will be
configured for each LAN.
This could be the config
router A
Tunnel 0
ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.252
tunnel source 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
tunnel destination 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
!
Ethernet0
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.252
ip address 10.1.1.254 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip route 10.1.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.2
router B
Tunnel 0
ip address 10.0.0.2 255.255.255.252
tunnel source 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
tunnel destination 192.168.1.1
!
Ethernet 0
ip address 192.168.1.2 255.255.255.252
ip address 10.1.2.254 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip route 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1
Is this solution possible??
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:06 EDT