Re: [nsp] connected flaps?

From: bmanning@ISI.EDU
Date: Fri Aug 14 1998 - 13:44:37 EDT


> That , or nail it up and insert the actual network into your BGP
> tables.... Solid as rock then.
> > >
> > > router bgp 4555
> > > no synchronization
> > > bgp dampening
> > > network 198.32.64.0
> > > redistribute connected metric 50 weight 3500
> >
> > Isn't it better to nail up a static route for that network to null0, and
> > redistribute static instead of connected?

Er, the actual network is (or should be) inserted into the BGP table.
Or at least thats what I thought the:

        network 198.32.64.0

entry did...

-- 
--bill



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Aug 04 2002 - 04:13:13 EDT