RE: Static IPv6 route

From: Guy Davies (Guy.Davies@telindus.co.uk)
Date: Mon Apr 08 2002 - 12:19:39 EDT


 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Peter,

> Hi Peter,
>
> It appears that you're using an address which might (incorrectly)
> be interpreted as a network address as a next-hop -
> 3ffe:80ef:201::0. It depends what the prefix length of the network
> containing that host is. If it is 3ffe:80ef:201::0/48 or longer
> then you have specified a network address. If it's in a shorter
> prefix network then this might be a valid host address.
>
> The next-hop is also within the prefix to which you're routing
> (also not illegal but possibly incorrectly programmed as such).
>
> I'd start by trying to configure your router as a host with a
> non-zero host-id. Then, if that still doesn't work, try statically
> routing to a network other than the one you're in! If that still
> doesn't work, talk to Juniper TAC.

I just reread this and it isn't particularly clear what I mean...

I would start by trying to configure your next-hop router with a
non-zero host-id. Then configure that new next-hop into your static
route....

Regards,

Guy

>
> Regards,
>
> Guy
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ProServe - Peter Batenburg [mailto:peter@proserve.nl]
> > Sent: Monday, April 08, 2002 4:30 PM
> > To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> > Subject: Static IPv6 route
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to setup a static IPv6 route, but it doesn't seem to
> > work: peter@amber# show routing-options
> > static {
> > route 3ffe:80e0::/28 {
> > next-hop 3ffe:80ef:201::;
> > community 21155:6099;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > peter@amber# commit
> > [edit routing-options static route 3ffe:80e0::/28]
> > RT: invalid destination 3ffe:80e0::/28 for family inet
> >
> > error: configuration check-out failed
> >
> > peter@amber# run show route 3ffe:80ef:201::
> >
> > inet6.0: 238 destinations, 241 routes (237 active, 0
> > holddown, 1 hidden)
> > + = Active Route, - = Last Active, * = Both
> >
> > 3ffe:80ef:201::/64 *[Direct/0] 3d 20:07:13
> > > via ge-1/0/0.0
> >
> > --- 3ffe:80ef:201:: ping6 statistics ---
> > 7 packets transmitted, 7 packets received, 0% packet loss
> > round-trip min/avg/max = 0.743/0.783/0.836 ms
> >
> > Anyone got an idea why this is happening? Thanks.
> >
> > Met vriendelijke groet/With kind regards,
> >
> > Peter Batenburg
> >
> >
>
>
> *** END PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE ***
>
>
> This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the
> intended recipient only. If misdirected, please notify us by
> telephone and confirm
> that it has been deleted from your system and any copies
> destroyed. If you
> are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from
> using, printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail
> or any information contained in it. We use reasonable endeavors to
> virus scan all
> e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that
> this e-mail and
> any attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own
> virus checking. The right to monitor e-mail communications through
> our network is
> reserved by us.
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 7.0.1

iQA/AwUBPLHClo3dwu/Ss2PCEQI3KQCeMpTfKBvWTux2iBALpS2ZWCELYlYAn3nH
zyF0vJUCjtjidYlxPvsr/Mgf
=zwQL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

This e-mail is private and may be confidential and is for the intended
recipient only. If misdirected, please notify us by telephone and confirm
that it has been deleted from your system and any copies destroyed. If you
are not the intended recipient you are strictly prohibited from using,
printing, copying, distributing or disseminating this e-mail or any
information contained in it. We use reasonable endeavors to virus scan all
e-mails leaving the Company but no warranty is given that this e-mail and
any attachments are virus free. You should undertake your own virus
checking. The right to monitor e-mail communications through our network is
reserved by us.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:35 EDT