I think we all learnt that if you assume you make
an ass out of you and me. :)
Please send me your configs offline or post in here,
and I can share my findings with you.
-Joe
---- fraanro <fraanro@arrakis.es> wrote:
> Can you send the configs? ASAIK that should work,
that is, both Cisco
> and Juniper support MPLS VPNs having RSVP between
the PEs. Have you
> established the RSVP tunnels between the loopbacks
you are using for MP-
> MGP?
>
> I have configured it in Cisco and works, in Juniper
also, why it should
> not work for Juniper-Cisco if TE interoperates
between them?
>
> Javier.
>
> ----- Mensaje Original -----
> Remitente: online <johnliu@online.sh.cn>
> Fecha: Sabado, Mayo 25, 2002 3:10 pm
> Asunto: mpls vpn over RSVP TE with Cisco
>
> > Hello, All,
> > How to interoperate JUNOS with IOS to direct the
mpls vpn into
> > rsvp TE?
> > CE1---PE1---P1---P2---P3---PE2---CE2
> > PE1 is JUNOS, PE2 is IOS.We want MPLS VPN over
the TE between both
> > PEs.JUNOS has 2 protocols to signaling MPLS VPN
for the
> > intermediate label
> > allocation.
> > One is LDP , the other is RSVP. JUNOS can work
with JUNOS via RSVP.
> > We can interoperate TE with them, but MPLS VPN
can't be over RSVP.
> > We tried LDP-tunning, still failed.
> > We found LDP neighbor can be established between
2 PEs. CE's route can
> > be seen each other.
> > But the label for VRF can't be allocation in both
PE.
> > We even tried move TE setup in P1,not PE1,also
LDP-tunning, failed
> > again.
> > Any suggestion?
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:35 EDT