Vijay,
Two things.
You referred to OSPF/IS-IS/BGP. I am not talking about routing protocols. I am asking about signaling protocols for TE (specifically RSVP-TE and CR-LDP).
And I don't think you are right in assuming "..The wavelength, VPI/VCI, DLCI, shim label days are essentially OVER...". Guess that's a sweeping statement ! Do you have some reasons to feel this way ? I feel still careers rely on ATM for providing the type of QoS it does ! And I feel "wavelength" days are definitely not "over" (not for those long-haul optical carriers).
-Cosmo
------------- Original Message --------------
On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, Vijay Gill wrote:
> I think there would be an inter-operation issue if Juniper talks to a
> router/switch which supports CR-LDP. Furthermore the different type of
> labels (VPI/VCI, DLCI, wave-length, shim labels...) would be another issue.
Lets be realistic here, chances of a router (juniper or otherwise) talking
with a router/switch which supports anything other than The wavelength, VPI/VCI, DLCI, shim
label days are essentially OVER ospf/isis/bgp and
RSVP-TE are fairly remote, and hopefully, thanks to the telcom meltdown,
should be getting remoter by the day. for the short term future and not a day
too soon.
AKA, I don't think this lack of support of CR-LDP is going to be a major
concern going forward.
thanks
have a nice day
/vijay
____________________________________________________
http://www.monsterindia.com - The Best Jobs. For the Best Minds.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:36 EDT