On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, steve ulrich wrote:
>
> uhh- i'm not following the logic there. if the JNPR's aren't to be
> LER's why bother having L2/MPLS encapsulation on them? i'm not
> looking to argue the densities and functionality i'm just curious as
> to where you came to the conclusion that the JNPR's aren't designed to
> be LER's.
Densities, functionality...Juniper says they are core routers..
> L2/MPLS functionality is a pretty moot point in the core of the
> network. you don't care what the labelled encapsulations are you're
> just switching based on label.
That was my point. We agree.
andy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:36 EDT