Andy,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Walden [mailto:andy@tigerteam.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 5:56 PM
> To: steve ulrich
> Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] L2 VPN examples
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, steve ulrich wrote:
> >
> > uhh- i'm not following the logic there. if the JNPR's aren't to be
> > LER's why bother having L2/MPLS encapsulation on them? i'm not
> > looking to argue the densities and functionality i'm just curious as
> > to where you came to the conclusion that the JNPR's aren't
> designed to
> > be LER's.
>
> Densities, functionality...
Absolutely, a very nice reason to use them as a LER ;-)
>Juniper says they are core routers..
Not quite :-)
Andy
>
> > L2/MPLS functionality is a pretty moot point in the core of the
> > network. you don't care what the labelled encapsulations are you're
> > just switching based on label.
>
> That was my point. We agree.
>
> andy
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:36 EDT