A Juniper router is not a load-balancing switch/appliance. If you want an
alternative to Local Director try with Riverstone, Foundry, Alteon,
Arrowpoint (Cisco), F5 Labs, ... There is no way to define a Virtual IP for
load-balancing among a ser of real servers.
^ ^
==============ooo====(.)v(.)====ooo=====
Javier Antich Romaguera
Network Consultant
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TELINDUS
Pza. Ciudad de Viena, 6-2º
28040 Madrid
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
javier.antich@telindus.es
tel: +34 91 456 00 08
fax: +34 91 536 10 74
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For more information about our products and services,
please visit our website http://www.telindus.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Full connectivity & mobility
==================ooo0===0ooo========
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: Preggie Govender [SMTP:pgovender@grintek.com]
> Enviado el: miércoles 29 de agosto de 2001 19:41
> Para: Juniper
> Asunto: Juniper alternative to Local-director
>
> Guys,
>
> Can a Juniper router be configured to operate like Cisco's Local-director
> i.e :
>
>
> {
> { ++++++>(Server-1 - IP1)
> {+++++>(LD - IP)++
> { ++++++>(Server-2 - IP2)
> {
>
> Where the Local Director (LD) faces the client network in a client-server
> architecture and all the clients sends requests to the LD, the servers are
> connected to the LD and the LD load balances between server-1 and server-2
> using response times from each server.
>
> Can a Juniper router be configured in the same manner ?
>
> Regards,
>
> Preggie
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:37 EDT