Hi,
thanks for your help, but on the website is mentioned that multipath doesn't
work with eBGP multihop.
Any other idea ?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Carsten Strahler
Core Network Planning IP
Lambdanet Communications GmbH
Guenther-Wagner-Allee 13
D-30177 Hannover (Germany)
Phone +49 (0)511 / 84 88 - 12 86
Fax +49 (0)511 / 84 88 - 12 69
mailto:carsten.strahler@lambdanet.net
News & Facts finden Sie auf unserer Website: www.lambdanet.de
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----Ursprungliche Nachricht-----
Von: sean capshaw [mailto:capshaw@juniper.net]
Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2001 22:55
An: Strahler, Carsten
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; jared@puck.nether.net
Betreff: Re: [j-nsp] BGP with equal static routes
Hello,
Junos has supported EBGP multipath since 4.3 so the workaround you are
describing is not necessary.
Please have a look at:
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos50/swconfig50-routing/html/bgp
-config30.html#1015717
Thanks
Sean
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Strahler, Carsten wrote:
> Hi,
>
> one question. We'd like to connect a customer via two E1 to our M20s. To
the
> customer we run Multihop-BGP.
> What will happen if we define two equal static routes to the BGP-Nexthop ?
> Will each customer-prefix be routed over only one E1? Or do we have a
> per-packet or per-destination distribution?
> We want to avoid using Multilink-PPP because of the additional PIC needed.
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Carsten Strahler
>
> Core Network Planning IP
>
> Lambdanet Communications GmbH
> Guenther-Wagner-Allee 13
> D-30177 Hannover (Germany)
>
> Phone +49 (0)511 / 84 88 - 12 86
> Fax +49 (0)511 / 84 88 - 12 69
> mailto:carsten.strahler@lambdanet.net
>
> News & Facts finden Sie auf unserer Website: www.lambdanet.net
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:37 EDT