RE: Minimal configuration for routing between two ports

From: Jan Stanicek (Jan.Stanicek@unient.cz)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 11:59:17 EDT


Hello,

        It looks, that I solved this problem.

        I had one of these workstations connected through corporate LAN.
        I had management connection (to fxp0 interface) through the same
LAN. When I unconnected management port, everything is working well.

        Thank you very much for your responses.

        Have a nice rest of day.

                Jan Stanicek

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wayne@n3si.com [mailto:wayne@n3si.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 8:52 PM
> To: Jan Stanicek; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: Minimal configuration for routing between two ports
>
>
> Jan,
>
> lets see your routing protocol config. By default RIP is not
> set up, and
> does not advertise other routes learned by RIP. RIP will
> listen for either
> V1, V2, or both on a given interface, but this needs to be
> configured. Let
> me know and I can help you out here!
>
> wayne
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Stanicek [mailto:Jan.Stanicek@unient.cz]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2001 7:39 AM
> To: 'juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net'
> Subject: Minimal configuration for routing between two ports
>
>
> Hello all,
>
> I am very sorry for this trivial questions.
>
> I need to set up routing betwen two ports:
>
> fe-1/1/0 {
> unit 0 {
> family inet {
> address 192.168.1.143/24;
> }
> }
> }
> fe-1/1/1 {
> unit 0 {
> family inet {
> address 192.168.111.1/24;
> }
> }
> }
>
> I have worstations with addresses 192.168.1.7 and
> 192.168.111.141 connected
> to apropriate port.
>
> I am able (for example) to ping from workstatin 192.168.1.7 to port
> 192.168.111.1, but it is not possible to ping from
> workstation 192.168.1.7
> to second workstation 192.168.1.141.
>
> I have tried to configure static routes, RIP, but nothing helps me.
>
> Can anybody send me a list of things, which I should
> configure for routing
> between these two ports?
>
> Thank you very much, and again ... sorry for this
> trivial question.
>
>
> Jan Stanicek
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:37 EDT