Re: [j-nsp] Cisco equivilant to an M5?

From: Niels Bakker (niels=juniper-nsp@bakker.net)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2001 - 17:01:24 EST


* Guy.Davies@telindus.co.uk (Guy Davies) [Thu 06 Dec 2001, 22:55 CET]:
[..]
> As Neils has pointed out, the main benefit of the M5 is it's
> scalability (you could even say that the M10 might be a better bet).
> I was just basing my comments on Chris' stated requirement for 4 T1s
> and 4 FE (he made no mention of cable operators and fiber rings in
> his first - or second - email ;-). Given his subsequent email, I'd
> have no reservations in recommending the M5/M10. The only limitation
> of the M5 being that you're limited to GE/OC12 whereas the M10/M20
> could give you OC48 (if that's a projected requirement).

Same here (except that I'd like to note the limit is "a few GigE/OC12").

        -- Niels.





This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:38 EDT