But can you do this without RSVP enabled, aka just using LDP and still
get your igp and bgp into inet.3
Mike
>Hi,
>Do you want to use the router as LER(LSP edge Router)?
>To activate inet.0 prefixs to use labels you shoud use
traffic-engineering in the mpls statement.
>To put labels (inet.3) to bgp routes you should put "set protocols mpls
traffic-engineering bgp"
>To put "RSVP labels" to IGP and BGP routes you should put "set
protocols mpls traffic->engineering bgp-igp"
>and to put "RSVP and LDP labels" to IGP and BGP routes you should put
>"set protocols mpls traffic-engineering bgp-igp-both-ribs" (you should
have Junos 5.1 or 5.2)
>matias
> Matias G. Lambert
> Multiservice Network & BackBone
> Technical support
> Technology
> Compañía Ericsson S.A.C.I.
> Av.E. Madero 942 - Piso 9 - C1106ACX
> Buenos Aires - Argentina
> T.E.:+54 11 4319-5503
> Fax:+54 11 4319-5603
> www.ericsson.com.ar ">matias.lambert@cea.ericsson.se
<mailto:matias.lambert@cea.ericsson.se?Subject=RE:%20LSP's%20for%20IGP%2
0versus%20iBGP&In-Reply-To=<4526F8387AE6D311926C0008C75D2E3705625091@eam
bant111.cea.ericsson.se>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Nisar Ali [mailto:">nisar@juniper.net
<mailto:nisar@juniper.net?Subject=RE:%20LSP's%20for%20IGP%20versus%20iBG
P&In-Reply-To=<4526F8387AE6D311926C0008C75D2E3705625091@eambant111.cea.e
ricsson.se> ]
>Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 6:24 PM
>To: Neil Stirling
>Cc: '">juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
<mailto:juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net?Subject=RE:%20LSP's%20for%20IGP%20ve
rsus%20iBGP&In-Reply-To=<4526F8387AE6D311926C0008C75D2E3705625091@eamban
t111.cea.ericsson.se> '
>Subject: Re: LSP's for IGP versus iBGP
>Hi:
>On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 09:43:17AM -0000, Neil Stirling wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> When configuring LSP's for access by route's on an IGP (i.e. OSPF) is
it
>> better to advertise the IGP into BGP through a
>> policy statement (hence using inet.3 db)
>It is not very clear what you are trying to achieve; but announcing
>IGP into BGP is not a good idea for any reason.
>>or enabling IGP LSP usage through
>> the 'traffic-engineering shortcuts' command ?
>Yes, if you want to use LSPs for destination prefixes and those
prefixes
>do not have same next hop as the egress of the LSP.
>> The policy statement exports OSPF into BGP group internal.
>>
>> Also, will fast-reroute & CSPF still benefit IGP route's if the
>> traffic-engineering shortcuts command is used instead of policy ?
>IGP shortcuts allows you to use farthest LSP along the shortest
>IGP path towards the destination.
> nisar
>> I guess then RSVP & LDP still applicable.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Neil.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:39 EDT