Sigh, reminds me of when Sun used to landfill old 3/50s they took in
trade instead of doing something useful for nonprofits.
This is different, of course.
So Juniper has a "use m5s instead of 7206s" program and Cisco has
the "Juniper buyback". I guess we all benefit from this somehow?
Anyway, on-topic:
My understanding of the "packet reordering" issue is that Juniper
claims that it can (not will) only happen if there's only one
flow going across the whole router. Is this essentially correct?
Thanks,
Avi
> I get the impression that they destroy these boxes. Smash them to little
> router bits, as I recall. They do, alledgedly, strip out the valuable bits
> like flash and RAM.
>
> Daniel Golding NetRail,Inc.
> "Better to light a candle than to curse the darkness"
>
> On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, Randy Bush wrote:
>
> > > Yes, I know that some1 will say "who would sell their junipers" but I'l
> > > ask the question, what/who/where is the best source of secondhand,
> > > surplus, offlease, liquidated, etc, Juniper gear: parts and complete
> > > systems?
> >
> > cisco. i gather they're buying them for big money from folk if they'll
> > replace them with ciscos.
> >
> > randy
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:40 EDT