We (AS4006) use Junipers (M20s and M40s) as peering routers in six
locations. They work quite well for this application - better than GSRs or
7500s, IMHO.
- Daniel Golding
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hank Nussbacher [mailto:hank@att.net.il]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 1:26 AM
> To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
> Subject: [j-nsp] Are Junipers used at peering points?
>
>
> I know that Juniper now has 30%+ of the core router market. My
> question is
> do people use Junipers at public and private peering points as well or is
> it still 100% Cisco 7500s?
>
> Thanks,
> Hank
>
From randy@psg.com £óÅ;Ma
Received: from someone claiming to be
rip.psg.com (exim@rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39])
by puck.nether.ne£óÅ;.1
for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:28:58 -0500
(envelope-from £óÅ;y@~h\7B.nether.net
Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:28:58 -0500
Received: from randy by rip.psg.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1)
id £óÅ;9n
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; c£óÅ;et
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Greg Ketell <gketell@juniper.net>
Cc: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>, <ju£óÅ;r-
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Are Junipers used at peering points?
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010313082456.00abe£óÅ;ma
<4.3.2.7.2.20010313133205.01cbf940@localhost>
Message-Id: <E14cz9n-000B07-00@rip.psg.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar£óÅ;1
> Peering points were actually the very first places Junipers were
> installed.
i think some crazy people
randy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:40 EDT