anyone know the particular configuration details needed to bring up
some form of signalling between a juniper and a fore switch such that
the juniper is able to display the fore's switchid? (per the 3.4 new
features list)
or is signalling not required?
-- nicholas harteau nrh@ikami.comFrom jared@puck.neth¢óÅ;etReceived: (from jared@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f2DETSQ27623 for junipe¢óÅ;p@localhost1/8.9.3) iI (envelope-from jared) Resent-Message-Id: <200103131429.f2DETSQ27623@puck¢óÅ;heReceived: (from slist@localhost) by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f2DDcqj26312; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:38:52 -05¢óÅ;(eDate: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:38:52 -0500 X-From_: paul@mabey.net Tue Mar 1¢óÅ;:3Received: from someone claiming to be c007.snv.cp.net (c007-h010.c007.snv.cp.net [209.228.33.216]) by puck.ne¢óÅ;.n for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:38:51 -0500 (envelope¢óÅ;m Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:38:51 -0500 Received: (cpmta 9484 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2001 05¢óÅ;45Old-Date: 13 Mar 2001 05:38:45 -0800 Message-ID: <20010313133845.9483.cpmta@c007.snv.cp.net> X-Sent: 13 Mar 2001 13¢óÅ;45ReCeived: from [198.133.22.75] by mail.mabey.net with HTTP; 13 Mar 2001 05:38:45 PST Content-Type: text/plain Con¢óÅ;-DMime-Version: 1.0 To: hank@att.net.il From: paul@mabey.net Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net X-Mailer: We¢óÅ;ilSubject: Re: [j-nsp] Are Junipers used at peering points? X-Diagnostic: Not on the accept list X-Envelope-To: ju¢óÅ;r-ResEnt-From: jared@puck.nether.net Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:29:28 -0500 Resent-To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net¢óÅ;nkWe (AS2685) have been using them as peering routers (private and public) for 2 years now with no major problems.
rgds,¢óÅ;l
> > I know that Juniper now has 30%+ of the core router market. My quest¢óÅ;is> it still 100% Cisco 7500s? > > Thanks, >¢óÅ;k Received: from someone claiming to be red.juniper.net (red.juniper.net [207.17.136.137]) by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2DLWvD16175 for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:32:57 -0500 (envelope-from gketell@juniper.net) Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:32:57 -0500 Received: from gketell-lt.juniper.net (ssh.juniper.net [207.17.136.39]) by red.juniper.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA10372; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:32:37 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010313133205.01cbf940@localhost> X-Sender: gketell@localhost X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:32:40 -0800 To: Hank Nussbacher <hank@att.net.il>, <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net> From: Greg Ketell <gketell@juniper.net> Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Are Junipers used at peering points? In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010313082456.00abe760@max.ibm.net.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Peering points were actually the very first places Junipers were installed. GK
At 08:26 AM 3/13/2001 +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: >I know that Juniper now has 30%+ of the core router market. My question >is do people use Junipers at public and private peering points as well or >is it still 100% Cisco 7500s? > >Thanks, >Hank
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:40 EDT