Re: Fw: Juniper Config for Peering-points

From: Manoj Leelanivas (manoj@juniper.net)
Date: Thu Mar 22 2001 - 18:07:12 EST


This issue will be resolved from 4.4 onwards. Previous releases need
a dummy peer-as at the group level.

Also, using one peer-group for all EBGP peers sharing the same policy
will result in the peers sharing the same RIB-OUT, saving memory usage.

-Manoj

>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Daniel Golding" <dan@netrail.net>
>To: "nicholas harteau" <nrh@ikami.com>; "Arnd Vehling" <av@nethead.de>
>Cc: "Bauer Kurt" <KBauer@ait.at>; "Juniper-Nsp (E-Mail)"
><juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>
>Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:26 PM
>Subject: RE: Juniper Config for Peering-points
>
>
> > Yeah, this is a problem. You can put in anything for the "dummy" AS,
>though.
> > As I understand it, the problem is in the "commit" syntax checking. This
>is
> > also a problem with Confed BGP peers.
> >
> > - Daniel Golding
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nicholas harteau [mailto:nrh@ikami.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 11:52 AM
> > > To: Arnd Vehling
> > > Cc: Bauer Kurt; Juniper-Nsp (E-Mail)
> > > Subject: Re: Juniper Config for Peering-points
> > >
> > >
> > > Arnd Vehling wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Bauer Kurt wrote:
> > > > > is there an easy way to configure a lot of different peers
> > > with different
> > > > > ASes on a Juniper (JunOS 4.3), other than to make a bgp-group
> > > for every peer
> > > > > ?? Maybe one group for all peers or something similar ??
> > > >
> > > > You can make one group for all peers, sure.
> > >
> > > The one odd thing I've noticed about this is that, atleast in the 4.2
> > > releases of the software that I'm currently running, you need to specify
> > > a bogus peer-as for the entire group before you can specify a real
> > > peer-as inside the neighbor {} heirarchy.
> > >
> > > i.e.
> > > group aads-peers {
> > > peer-as 65535;
> > > neighbor 206.220.243.666 {
> > > peer-as 666;
> > >
> > > or somesuch.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > nicholas harteau
> > > nrh@ikami.com
> > >
> >

From marcoh@cistron-¿óÅ;ce
Received: from someone claiming to be
        smtp.cistron-office.nl (mail@10fwd.cistron-office.nl¿óÅ;5.
        by puck.nether.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2NAdSD15486
        for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 23 Mar ¿óÅ; 0
        (envelope-from marcoh@cistron-office.nl)
Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 05:39:28 -0500
Received: from subs¿óÅ;.c
        by smtp.cistron-office.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian))
        id 14gOyX-0000OA-00
        for¿óÅ;ni
Received: (from marcoh@localhost)
        by subspace.cistron-office.nl¿óÅ;9.
        for juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:39:21 +0100
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 20¿óÅ;1:
From: MarcoH <marcoh@cistron.nl>
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Message-ID: <20010323113920.C6765@cistron.nl>¿óÅ;e-
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-NCC-RegID: n¿óÅ;st
SubJect: [j-nsp] filtering on prefix length

Hi there,

I`ve got some problems with configuring a bgp-import policy wh¿óÅ;wi
filtEr out all prefixes with a mask greater then /24.

I`ve been trying several route-filter settings, but can`t seem t¿óÅ;nd
riGht one, either it drops all prefixes or it accepts the all.

TIA,

MarcoH

-- 
Q:	What do you call someone with he¿óÅ;, A: 	An incurable romantic.

From dave.humphrey@t¿óÅ;duReceived: from someone claiming to be cain.telindus.co.uk (mail.telindusk.net [212.134.¿óÅ;]) for <juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net>; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 06:02:¿óÅ;05 (enVelope-from dave.humphrey@telindusk.net) Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 06:02:57 -0500 Received: from IPARCHITECT ¿óÅ;AR id¿óÅ;19Reply-To: <dave.humphrey@telindusk.net> From: "Dave Humphrey" <dave.hSubject: RE: Date: Fri¿óÅ; MMessage-ID: <NOEILJNJDOKCIBMEPNCKKECAGMAA.dave.humphrey@telindusk.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Ty¿óÅ;te charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: M¿óÅ;soIn-Reply-To: <20010323113920.C6765@cistron.nl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsof¿óÅ;meImportance: Normal

Hello,

Try the following

route-filter 0.0.0.0/0 upto /24

Cheers

Dave H¿óÅ;reFrom: MarcoH [mailto:marcoh@cistron.nl] Sent: 23 March 2001 10:39 To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether¿óÅ; S

Hi there,

I`ve got some problems with configuring a bgp-import policy which ¿óÅ; f

I`ve been trying several route-filter settings, but can`t seem to fi¿óÅ;he

TIA,

MarcoH

-- Q: What do you call someone with herpes¿óÅ;DSA: An incurable romantic.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:41 EDT