On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 12:51:17PM -0700, Robert Raszuk wrote:
>
>
> Jesper,
>
> > Much harder to control on a per-LSP basis, especially when talking about
> > LDP/TDP controlled LSP's.
>
> Let's don't mix different things here :).
No.
> I was assuming that the entire
> conversation is reg the TE-LSPs only. The LDP/TDP LSPs have quite
> different characteritics reg exp/imp-null treatment of received labels
> at PHP (at least in cisco's) comparing to TE-LSPs.
>
> Anyhow I agree in LDP LSPs (or prefix based LSPs) the knob would be
> usefull per int.
I find it much more important for LDP controlled LSP's than for
TE-LSP's, as this will ensure a label with EXP bit's on all hops within
the network.
/Jesper
-- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: FreeBSD committer @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-)One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:41 EDT