Hi Guys,
We've also bumped into the can't ping the shared IP address when it's failed
over and got the answer that it is all implemented in accordance with the
RFC. We'd really like to have this 'fixed'. The RFC is very unclear on this
and it does cause problems in the operational space.
Most other vendors seem to have found a wy to fix this without breaking the
intended purpose of the protocol and without having it to go through the
IETF again (and call it things like FSRP, enhanced VRRP, etc.).
Regards,
Gert Kremer
Senior Network Architect
KPNQwest
-----Original Message-----
From: Greg Ketell [mailto:gketell@juniper.net]
Sent: 04 April 2001 18:02
To: Brown, Mike; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Cc: 'Avi Freedman'; ronjeremy@raemail.com
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] voting for enhancements ? was -- RE: Ping VRRP
virtual IP address
You have that ability now. You submit your requests, they submit their
requests: Product Management rolls all similar requests into a single
enhancement request. When the value to the customers of that request
out-weighs the value of their other requests that feature gets done.
GK
At 12:59 AM 4/4/2001 -0500, Brown, Mike wrote:
>Ask your sales team for the ability to vote for product enhancements that
>other customers have submitted. This might help the priority of some of
>the lower incremental revenue feature requests.
>
>Regards,
>Mike Brown
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Avi Freedman
>[<mailto:freedman@freedman.net>mailto:freedman@freedman.net]
>Sent: Tuesday, April 03, 2001 11:51 PM
>To: ronjeremy@raemail.com
>Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
>Subject: Re: Ping VRRP virtual IP address
>
>
>Ideally, yes.
>Juniper says it would be against RFC.
>
>Some of us disagree; to help the cause, if other people who spend $ with
>Juniper could ask their Juniper reps for that "feature" to be implemented,
>it'd be appreciated...
>
>Thanks,
>
>Avi
>
> >
> > Can I ping the virtual IP address of a juniper running VRRP?
> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 05 2002 - 10:42:41 EDT