[alcatel-nsp] Can sap-egress policy remark dscp on L2 service?

[Smith, Anton (Anton)]

Ah but that's different. I am fairly sure you can classify on *ingress* to
an L2 service, based on L3 headers.

 

Regards,

Anton Smith

 

Technical Sales, IPD.

 

  _____  

From: alcatel-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:alcatel-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Thedin Guruge
Sent: den 27 januari 2011 08:44
To: Garcia Del Rio, Diego (Diego)
Cc: alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [alcatel-nsp] Can sap-egress policy remark dscp on L2 service?

 

Inspecting l3 headers on a l2 service isn't the wisest thing to do is it? :)

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Garcia Del Rio, Diego (Diego)
<diego.garcia_del_rio at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:

Unfortunately, no, L2 services can only mark .1p bits but not dscp.
Diego Garcia del Rio
Product Management, IPD
Mountain View,CA
+1 (415) 439-9420



----- Original Message -----
From: alcatel-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net
<alcatel-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net>
To: Dan Snyder <sliplever at gmail.com>
Cc: alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net <alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thu Jan 27 06:43:36 2011
Subject: Re: [alcatel-nsp] Can sap-egress policy remark dscp on L2 service?

The default queue is 1 though. I tried a different queue and that
doesn't matter as well. I have found some material that says only
dot1p can be marked on a vpls/vll sap-egress.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 7:11 PM, Dan Snyder <sliplever at gmail.com> wrote:
> Your forwarding class is not mapped to a queue.
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:34 PM, Bryan <deadheadblues at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Suppose I have a sap-egress policy with the following configuration
>>
>> *A:r4>config>qos>sap-egress$ info
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>            queue 1 create
>>            exit
>>            fc af create
>>                dscp af31
>>            exit
>> ----------------------------------------------
>>
>> If I apply this on a VPLS Sap will, it re-mark any traffic received in
>> the AF class (from its network interface) to af31? It doesn't seem to
>> work and I am questioning whether it is valid.
>>
>> Thank you,
>>
>> Bryan
>> _______________________________________________
>> alcatel-nsp mailing list
>> alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/alcatel-nsp
>>
>

_______________________________________________
alcatel-nsp mailing list
alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/alcatel-nsp

_______________________________________________
alcatel-nsp mailing list
alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/alcatel-nsp

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/alcatel-nsp/attachments/20110127/8fc6f411/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 6539 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/alcatel-nsp/attachments/20110127/8fc6f411/attachment-0001.bin>