[alcatel-nsp] Strange throughput decrease after implemented LAG
Dejan Tepic
dejantep at gmail.com
Sun Apr 19 14:41:00 EDT 2020
Ok, thanks for the clarification. I was just reading that. It seems that
port-fair option would be optimal to both spray traffic across ports on
different IOMs and ensure that SLA is respected
Den sön 19 apr. 2020 kl 20:15 skrev Craig Publow <cpublow at gmail.com>:
> The description from the user guide makes it clear that this is applicable
> to access side of things (access/hybrid ports). Also explains why in
> default mode you’re seeing 50% of traffic using access lag. If you had a 4
> port lag, you’d only have 25%.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 1:59 PM Dejan Tepic <dejantep at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the pointer. i'll read up on it. First of all i provided wrong
>> info in my post. My LAG is hybrid mode and not network.
>> Do you know if change of this setting will cause any disruption?
>>
>> Den sön 19 apr. 2020 kl 19:26 skrev Craig Publow <cpublow at gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi Dejan
>>>
>>> Have a look at adapt-qos in the interface guide. I believe you’ll want
>>> adapt-qos link rather the default of distributed.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Craig
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 12:09 PM Dejan Tepic <dejantep at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> We are running MPLS ring with 2 7750 as BNG and number of 7210 Sx. To
>>>> meet growing capacity we have activated LAG om links closest to both BNG,
>>>> 2x10G.
>>>> In VPRN service we have subscriber interface with group if and
>>>> static-host and msap for DHCP
>>>> but also number of regular interfaces for some customers with subnets
>>>> and stati saps
>>>>
>>>> In both scenario we are using same ingress/egress qos but hte issue we
>>>> have is that customers with normal vprn interfaces are getting only 50% of
>>>> their service capacity. 30mbit gives 15, 100mbit gives 50 etc.
>>>> Everything worked as expected prior to 2x10G LAG. LAG is over network
>>>> ports and has dynamic cost enabled.
>>>>
>>>> Also we have noticed that managed subscribers are receiving double the
>>>> capacity on upstream. This is not 100% confirmed.
>>>>
>>>> It feels as some setting has to be adjusted but what?
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> alcatel-nsp mailing list
>>>> alcatel-nsp at puck.nether.net
>>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/alcatel-nsp
>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/alcatel-nsp/attachments/20200419/17f42461/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 690CD03E-016C-4E27-B09E-57EC89B13AC9.png
Type: image/png
Size: 189970 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/alcatel-nsp/attachments/20200419/17f42461/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the alcatel-nsp
mailing list