"AM" vs. DSB
William Gode
wiley at INTERACCESS.COM
Mon Nov 17 18:52:57 EST 1997
On Mon, 17 Nov 1997, Joel Govostes wrote:
>
> I never did monitor my own signal, (and the rig operated fine,) but now I
> wonder - was the rig only generating the sidebands (both); i.e. was there
> no carrier generated in that case (true DSB)? Or would there have actually
> been a carrier, perhaps reduced, compared to a "normal" AM transmitter -
> signal.
Since the original question pertained to a Hallicrafters transmitter,
"DSB" was used by Hallicrafters to signify the AM mode with their
SSB transmitters. One put the rig in DSB mode which unbalanced the
balanced modulator, resulting in a carrier as the rig transmitted both
sidebands. It's nothing more than low-level AM from an SSB rig.
At least with my HT-37, DSB will not result in both sidebands being
transmitted with supressed carrier...regardless of the drive control
setting. The drive control is set to 1/2 of full scale CW output
giving 20-25 watts of carrier with modulation peaks of 100 watts when
the mike gain is set properly.
73,
Bill, W9NHQ
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
To subscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: subscribe BOATANCHORS yourfirstname yourlastname
To unsubscribe: listserv at listserv.tempe.gov
and in body: signoff BOATANCHORS
Archives for BOATANCHORS: http://www.tempe.gov/archives
--- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list