Morse Code Requirement Eliminated

[Chris Trask]

    So, it's a possibility that that the FCC is throwing Amateur Radio a
bone so that we'll back off on the BPL objections?

Chris

     ,----------------------.       High Performance Mixers and
    /    What's all this     \    Amplifiers for RF Communications
   / extinct stuff, anyhow?  /
   \  _______,--------------'           Chris Trask / N7ZWY
  _ |/                                  Principal Engineer
 oo\                                  Sonoran Radio Research
(__)\       _                             P.O. Box 25240
  \  \    .'  `.                     Tempe, Arizona 85285-5240
   \  \  /      \
    \  '"        \                 IEEE Senior Member #40274515
     .       (  ) \
      '-| )__| :.  \              Email: christrask at earthlink.net
        | |  | | \  '.       http://www.home.earthlink.net/~christrask
       c__; c__;  '-..'>.__

                       Graphics by Loek Frederiks




----- Original Message -----
From: "W5EUQ" <w5euq at VERIZON.NET>
To: <BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV>
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:02 PM
Subject: Re: [BOATANCHORS-TEMPE] Morse Code Requirement Eliminated


> You have a very good point here Ray.   The BPL thing is a BIG  thorn in
> their sides... it has to do with MONEY and making more MONEY.
> Amateur Radio, in their opinion, I believe, doesn't make a cent.  Of
> course we know that the world is MUCH better due to a lot of Ham Radio
> developments.  I'm soooo disappointed in the FCC.  You are also right
> that they won't regret it because they don't appear to care.  I'm
> usually not this negative, however, this time I'm really fed up with the
> FCC.
> Bob
>
> rayfri wrote:
> > John:
> > The FCC wont regret it.   You have to give a damn about something
> > before you can regret it one way or another.
> > The FCC hasnt given a crap about the hams for  years.....   going back
> > to the original round of "restructuring"
> > that took place back in the 70s...      Cynic that I am, I wouldnt be
> > surprised if they did this in order to try and eliminate
> > the crap they are getting for their idiocy over BPL.   Take some of
> > the attention off of that....
> >
> >
> >
> > John Bauer wrote:
> >
> >> They are going to live to regret this!
> >>
> >> John,  W4AWM
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >> This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
> >> -----------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> Subscription control -
> >> http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
> >> To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
> >> Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> > This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
> > -----------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subscription control -
> > http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
> > To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
> > Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
> >
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Subscription control -
http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
> To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
> Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.20/588 - Release Date: 12/15/06
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------

Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html