[AWA] CW, the Expansion of Phone and Amateur Radio
Ron Lawrence KC4YOY
kc4yoy at CAROLINA.RR.COM
Sat Dec 16 14:24:55 EST 2006
Well said Gary, 73 Ron kc4yoy
Gary Carter wrote:
> I have been an amateur radio operator for over 32 years. In that
> time I have enjoyed working various modes such as CW, SSB, AM, PSK31,
> SSTV, FM, etc. I have never been an ardent "flag waver" for any
> particular mode. I enjoy them all, because I enjoy amateur radio in general.
> In the first few months as a Novice, before I upgraded to General at
> the FCC regional office using the 13 WPM CW door, I would spend evenings
> working CW stations that were packed from one end of that tiny 50 kHz
> sliver of a band to the other. Every night that little segment was
> filled with signals of stations from all over the country, and some from
> outside of it!
> Since that time I have gone on to enjoy many modes of communication
> in amateur radio, as I mentioned earlier. Occasionally I will work some
> CW just to keep my hand in, and because I enjoy it. Starting about 10 or
> 15 years ago I started noticing a change in band usage. Just for grins I
> would go over to my old Novice stomping grounds on 80 and 40 meters,
> scan the frequencies and hear...........two, maybe three CW QSOs on a
> good day. And down below the old Novice segment on 80 meters it was
> worse! A veritable no mans land between 3.6 and 3.7 MHz, except for the
> odd digital signal or two. I know a lot of this was due to the phasing
> out of the Novice license and the popularity of the Technician license
> as the preferred means of entry into amateur radio.
> With the expansion of the phone bands into segments once teaming
> with CW signals the cry has gone up "they can't do this to us!",
> "they're cramming CW into a tiny 75 kHz window", etc. Funny, seems that
> when I've operated CW in the past 15 years that's where almost all the
> activity has been anyway. Seems to me this "they shall not pass"
> attitude doesn't appear to have the operational record to backup such a
> stance. Remember the whole "use it or lose it" campaign for 10 meters
> sometime in the mid to late 1970's? 'Nuff said!
> I for one welcome the expansion of the phone bands into the under
> utilized frequencies. The Canadians have been enjoying voice
> communications on some of those frequencies for decades, and it will be
> a nice change to be able to work European stations on 75 and 40 meters
> SSB and AM without having to work split frequency.
> As to the subject of the elimination of the CW requirement for
> operation below 30 MHz, this has been coming for decades. It has NEVER
> been a barrier to keep the LID operator and card carrying moron from
> joining our ranks, contrary to the misguided belief of some. Do a bit
> research into the history of amateur radio. The LID and lunatic have
> been with us since 1906. I have seen it proved time and time again that
> the ability to pass an Extra Class exam with the difficulty level of an
> EE doctorate (no matter what decade you passed it in), and then be able
> to send and receive CW anywhere from 20 to 20,000 WPM *DOES NOT*
> guarantee that the licensee is either intelligent or a good and
> courteous operator. Those qualities are not arrived at through mere tests.
> What are those of us who enjoy using CW to do? I'll tell you. Stop
> treating it as a requirement, some testosterone-soaked right of passage
> that "manly" ham operators should do in order to prove they're a "real"
> ham (whatever THAT is), and instead look at it, and encourage use of it
> for what it really is and has been for over 100 years: an art form. Yes,
> an art form. A mode of communication that demands a level of skill from
> it's operator that is not required by any other mode. Also emphasize to
> any prospective ham what a fun mode it is! A code that you can actually
> keep in your head and spout about without assistance from a computer.
> This is not the end of amateur radio. The "sky is falling" faction
> has always been out there. They screamed during the transition from
> spark to CW, they bellowed their disgust when AM joined CW, they kicked
> at SSB, and they've lamented anything that has the word "digital"
> associated with it.
> Am I denouncing tradition and all that has made amateur radio great
> to the present day, throwing it away as old and useless? Not a bit of
> it! I relish operating my homebrew one tube 1929 replica CW transmitter.
> I delight in making AM contacts with my boatanchor station from the
> 1950s. But I also enjoy running PSK31. I marvel at those hams who are
> into moonbounce, microwaves and satellites. To those experimenting with
> digital voice I say "go forward"! We amateur radio types are not a
> stagnant bunch, and we never shall be. The day we do become stationary
> in experimenting with technology and providing value to the nation
> through our public service work, that will be the day the FCC pulls the
> plug on us. And we'll deserve it.
>
> 73,
>
> Gary Carter - WA4IAM
> Amateur Extra Class (and still damn proud of it!)
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Questions or comments on any subject relating
> to radio history, radio collecting, buying and selling of radios or radio parts, radio collector clubs and radio collector events are welcome.
>
> Visit the AWA web page at: http://www.antiquewireless.org
>
> To Post message: antiquewirelessassociation at yahoogroups.com
>
> To Unsubscribe send a blank message to: antiquewirelessassociation-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiquewirelessassociation/
>
> <*> Your email settings:
> Individual Email | Traditional
>
> <*> To change settings online go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/antiquewirelessassociation/join
> (Yahoo! ID required)
>
> <*> To change settings via email:
> mailto:antiquewirelessassociation-digest at yahoogroups.com
> mailto:antiquewirelessassociation-fullfeatured at yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> antiquewirelessassociation-unsubscribe at yahoogroups.com
>
> <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
This list is a public service of the City of Tempe, Arizona
-----------------------------------------------------------
Subscription control - http://www.tempe.gov/lists/control.asp?list=BOATANCHORS
To post - BOATANCHORS at LISTSERV.TEMPE.GOV
Archives - http://listserv.tempe.gov/archives/BOATANCHORS.html
More information about the Boatanchors
mailing list